The Kamrup Metropolitan District and Sessions Court has ordered the reopening of Shyamkanu Mahanta’s bank account in connection with the ongoing Zubeen Garg murder case. The court cited non-compliance with Section 107 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) while freezing the account.
The development follows observations made during the hearing that due legal procedure was not adhered to by the Special Investigation Team (SIT) of Assam Police handling the case.
The Kamrup Metropolitan District and Sessions Court ordered the reopening of Shyamkanu Mahanta’s bank account in the Zubeen Garg murder case, citing non-compliance with Section 107 of the BNSS by the SIT. The court observed procedural lapses in the freezing of the account.
Court Observes Procedural Irregularities
During the hearing in Guwahati, the court noted that proper legal procedures under Section 107 of the BNSS were not followed when the bank account was frozen.
Due to this procedural lapse, the court directed that the account be restored.
The case is being investigated by a Special Investigation Team (SIT) of Assam Police.
Investigation Under SIT
The SIT was constituted to probe the alleged murder case involving Zubeen Garg. The investigation has included scrutiny of financial transactions and related assets.
The freezing of the bank account formed part of the investigative process. However, the court’s order indicates that statutory requirements under the BNSS must be strictly adhered to in such actions.
Legal Context: Section 107 of BNSS
Section 107 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita outlines procedural safeguards that must be followed in specific investigative actions.
The court’s reference to this section underscores the importance of compliance with procedural law during criminal investigations.
No official statement from the SIT or senior police leadership has been issued in response to the court’s observations as of now.
Why This Matters in Guwahati
The case has drawn significant public attention in Guwahati due to its legal and financial dimensions.
The court’s intervention highlights judicial oversight in ensuring procedural compliance during investigations conducted by law enforcement agencies.
Further hearings are expected to continue as the case progresses.
What Happens Next?
The investigation in the main case remains ongoing. The next hearing date is expected as per the court’s scheduling.
Authorities may review procedural steps in light of the court’s observations.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why did the court order the bank account to be reopened?
The court found that due procedure under Section 107 of the BNSS was not followed while freezing the account.
Is the investigation in the Zubeen Garg case still ongoing?
Yes. The investigation by the SIT is ongoing, and further hearings are scheduled.